if just on teaching is wrong you have to get up and go if the teacher does not repent and teach all that is right

I WAS BORN INTO A CHRISTIAN REFORM FAMILY FAMILY IN 1927 WENT TO NO 4th ST CHJRISTIAn school SO I THROUGHT I KNERW MUCH TII I MET HAROLD CAMPING ON OPEN FORUM IN 1977. I SOON FOUND OUT HOW LITTLE TO NOTHING I KLNEW. I DARE SAY THIS THIRTY TWO LATER[[IF]] IT WAS NOT FOR MR. C. @ OPEN FORUM I WOULD NOT BE BOUND FOR HEAVEN [TODAY 5=1=09] HENRY VAN DYK

MY ANSWER TO MR.C IS SIMPLE. LISTINIG TO YOU FOR THIRTY TWO YEARS I SAY YOU FORGOT MORE ABOUT THE BIBLE THAN THOSE WHO ARE CONDEMING YOU KNOW. I ADD TO THIS TO YOU "" THOSE WHO CONDEM YOU WERETO FOLLOW YOU AROUND FOR SEVEN DAYS DO WHAT YOU DO EACH DAY 'WOULD SPEND THE NEXT 23 DAYS IN A NURSEING HOME MR.CAMPING .THERSE WRITERS WOULD HAVE CONDEMED'' NOE'' TOO
I FOR ONE VERY HAPPY THAT GOD OPENED DANIEL 12 4 8 9 HENRY

hi, thanks,The article was very well written, very helpful to me

IF IT WAS NOT FOR FAMILY R I BE LOST TONIGH HEADED FOR HELL SINCE 1977 I DID MY BEST TO HELP AND SHARE IN F.R. AND WILL HELP AS LONG AS GOD GIVES ME LIFE. F.R. IS GROWING WE ARE NOT COWARDS MR.C.IS GODS MAN THAT FINDS THE ANSWERS AND THEN PASSES THEESE ON HE TO @ AND FOR ME IS ONLY MY TEACHER OF GOD,S WORD. SO IF YOU DON,T LIKE WHAT HE SAY,S FIND A BETTER ASNSWER OR DROWN IN UNBELEIF THANK YOU

Mr. Camping,
Hi!
I listened to your broadcast yesterday, June 10, 2009 regarding the End of Time.
I am really confused!
Would you be so kind as to provide a timeline with passages, as references, on your interpretation of how you arrived at May 21, 2011?
Also, why you feel the Bible is incorrect when it states in multiple passages that no one knows the hour, i.e. Mark 13:32, Matthew 24:36,
1 Thessalonians 5:2-4, Isaiah 29:5-6, Malachi 3:1, Luke 12:39-40, 2 Peter 3:10, Revelation 3:3, Revelation 16:15, etc.
I personally feel that you have gone out on a limb and I ask why would you do this?
If you are incorrect in your analysis, your entire ministry will be jeopardized!
I respect you greatly, but I need these answers from you!
I greatly appreciate your response!
May God Bless You and Keep You,
Steven Abraham
lagunacastles@cox.net
949.378.4005 Cell

Camping is into pagan numerology. He says the holy spirit is no longer in the church which is a blaspheme of the holy spirit - the worst sin - Who fills the food pantries - has many millions dedicating their lives - heals at healing masses - visits the sick and helps the poor - not Harold Camping! The bible is not a series of numbers, it is the living word of Jesus in the new testament - 3x17x5 - Campings magic formula - does that sound like the transcendent truth? - He says the prophets spoke in parables, so they were stoned and put to death because people did not understand their message? Canping does not embody the holy spirit or know anything about it

Harold Camping understanding is total out of context comparing scripture with scripture original meant compare spiritual meaning to words taught by the Spirit. This out of context reading causes him to view everything as synonym: law, covenant, et c. He does not recognize that Bible is a book of scrolls insisting that the wrong translation for Greek word scroll is word book which not invent until in around 1439. Harold Camping always flirts with the unpardonable sin with a Blasphemy against The Holy Spirit by claiming that The Holy Spirit spoke through a donkey to Balaam. But this idea that every sentence must be from The Holy Spirit would cause someone to claim that the words of Satan in the Bible are also by the Holy Spirit; this clearly the unpardonable sin. But most of all Harold Camping lies in saying that only goes by the Bible; he also goes by council of Chalcedon. But all who believe in Hypostatic Union are antichrists the Bible teaches this (John 4: 1-3). The Hypostastic Union crowd do not believe that Jesus came in the flesh they are using the word incarnation incorrectly to mean inpsychation since they believe that the Messiah came into a man (i.e. a human soul) and NOT in the flesh; compare how Pual understood the phase “in the flesh” (Philipians 1: 19-30 You will not find any mysterious union in his understanding of the phase “in the flesh”.). From the beginning Satan has misleadingly implied to Eve that she would be like God. And Moses warded Is real repeatedly NOT to Warship other gods even placing into the Ten Commandments that He is Jealous God as a warning. Logically you should not come to an opinion which would make the charges that had lead to Jesus’ crucifixion out to be true, you should not come to opinion which would resemble the deification of the Roman Emperors nor should you come to agree with the Greek Philosophers who disputed Paul over the idea that flesh was inferior. And one last point just ground logic, it would make no sense for salvation to be by the crucifixion and resurrection if a human could be saved by his own works (Galatian 3: 21) since they claim that Jesus is human but what is the biblical view “not from a man nor through a man, but through Jesus Christ” (Galatian 1: 1). As for the word tempted this Greek word is tested and it’s used also of The Father as well. Many have taught that the title The Son of man is a claim to being human but if you look in context “What if you should see The Son of man ascend to where he was at first” (John 6: 62) within context of the same scroll “the first” is a reference to the prolog of this scroll (John 1: 2). It should not seem odd to you that God would give himself a title like this since He had mad man after his own image and likeness sort of like making man according to His own blue-print. Let me ask you something, do you want to study the bible only to end up in hell? Because if you believe in Hypostatic Union that is where you’re going, the letter of John is so clear that Antichrists are to be hated that you could not even greet them.